Bad Night in Blacksburg for Men in Stripes

If you’ve dropped by for an excuse as to why Wake Forest lost to Virginia Tech in Blacksburg last night, you’ve come to the wrong place.

The Deacons lost because the Hokies, after falling behind by 11 early in the second half, took the game by the throat and played harder and better than Wake down the stretch. They attacked the basket with abandon, they hit their free throws, they outscrapped the Deacons for rebounds and they shut down Al-Farouq Aminu after Aminu’s amazing 21-point first half outburst. Their crowd was the best I’ve seen this season outside of Cameron, and Coach Seth Greenberg made the right moves down the stretch.

Kudos to Tech. It was an impressive win, one that should all but lock them into a bid for the NCAA Tournament.

And I’ll say once again, the next best thing to winning is to lose with a good excuse. As humans, we always think we’ve been wronged when we lose. Apparently, that’s the way we’re programmed.

Now having stipulated all that, I’ll agree with the general outcry that it was a terribly officiated basketball game. It was so bad it was hard to watch Mike Eades, Bob Donato and Tim Kelly botch one call and one situation after another.

The biggest problem was there wasn’t a lead official—technically known as a referee—among them. Eades was designated as such, but last night’s performance is pretty compelling evidence that he’s not up to the role. I agree with a good friend who said that if there had been a true referee on the court, a guy like a Karl Hess or Les Jones or even a Mike Wood working that game, it wouldn’t have disintegrated the way it did.

I didn’t see a replay of the shot by Malcolm Delaney that put the Hokies ahead in the second half, but I’ve heard from enough people that it was a two-pointer and not a three to believe it must have been. Putting the wrong player on the free throw line in the second half was an embarrassment, especially when he’s allowed to shoot and miss a free throw that is waved off while they get the right guy.

To me the saddest call of all was the double technical, and I’m basing that on having seen a good replay of the incident. Kelly called it originally on J.T. Thompson for shoving Chas McFarland. But after the officials huddled for about five minutes, and watched video of the play, they came back to say they were assessing a double technical on both players.

First off, I’m not even sure Thompson should have gotten a technical. I’ve seen far harder shoves that didn’t result in technicals. But I’m absolutely convinced that no other player in the ACC would have gotten the other technical besides Chas McFarland. He got that one on reputation. You could say he bumped Thompson, but it was little more than a brush, and much, much less than it was made out to be. I’ve seen Hess and Jones officiate enough games to know that they would have gone to both players and told them in no uncertain terms to knock it off. And the players would have, and play would have gone on.

Chas McFarland has a reputation as an agitator, and it’s well deserved. I wrote about it early this season and I read about it recently in ESPN The Magazine. Everyone knows that reputation, including Mike Eades, Bob Donato and Tim Kelly, and last night they allowed that reputation to influence the way a game was called. You can say McFarland brought it up himself, but it’s up to the officials to call the game as it’s played on the floor, period.

A good game was marred by bad officiating. It was hard to watch.

 

 

 

Back to the main page.

By Dan Collins on 02/17/2010 (12:07 pm)

Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Comments

Country,
This is for Chas McFarland and I hope he reads this. Chas was quoted in the Journal earlier:

“I hate sitting there watching my team,” McFarland said. “I feel like I should be out there with them.

Chas, you have the potential to participate @ the next level. Until you learn to control your emotions you prospects for success are minimal @ best @ the next level…

WFU players like Ish, Aminu, L.D. etc. focus their frustrations and energies to the court. It would behoove you to do likewise and GROW UP!!! You hurt your team by your immature antics…

For thirty minutes the team looked good. The last ten reminded me of the team in Nov. Dec. and early Jan. Trust they will be prepared for NCSU as Raleigh is no cake walk as Duke found earlier…

Tom on 02/17/2010 (2:53 pm)

Good post, Dan! You pretty much hit the nail on the head. It was a badly officiated game and it cost us some points but the team’s D in the 2nd half cost us more points. Giving up 55 in a half is horrible! We lost the game ourselves but the refs certainly didn’t help!

Ken Green on 02/17/2010 (2:52 pm)

Dan,
John Clougherty said in the latest issue of the Poop Sheet that he grades officials after every game.  Would you please call Mr. Clougherty and ask what grades these officials received?  He’ll probably say that is internal info, but when the officials decide a game (and VT going to the FT line 47 times[!] definitely decided this game), shouldn’t the ACC have the integrity to make public how the ACC graded these officials?

MarkDeac1 on 02/17/2010 (2:43 pm)

Good take here, Dan. We Deac fans can’t blame it all on the refs — just 90 percent?!? — because our team didn’t do it on defense and on the boards in the second half. With that said, I’m having a hard time remembering a performance that matched this wretched night by the zebras:

- as you alluded to, the refs award VT’s Delaney a 3 when his toe was clearly on the line and don’t even think to review it; had they not blown the call, we would’ve been shooting for the tie in our last possession

- VT player gets teched up for a forearm shiver to McFarland, but the refs review it and rule it a double technical; what is this—can you now review a flagrant, dead-ball move like that to see if the recipient looked too suspicious?!?!? Yes, Chas’ rep certainly factored in there.

- Ish gets tripped dribbling up the court after a rare stop on D and loses the ball — no call; a split second later, they call a tripping foul on McFarland

- 47 to 27 FTA disparity — the dry-erase board behind the Wake bench said it all

Do we take solace that we still were close in the end despite only playing our game for one half and going 5 on 8 for the second half?

Keep your heads up, Deacs!

P.S. I’m really proud of you, L.D.!!!

Lee, B. on 02/17/2010 (12:48 pm)

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2
Dan Collins covers Wake Forest University sports for the Winston-Salem Journal.

Recent Comments

» Doug on 'Getting a New Career in Gear.'

» Doug on 'Getting a New Career in Gear.'

» DeaconDash on 'Getting a New Career in Gear.'

» ray on 'Wake's Jewel.'

» Lee Anglin on 'Getting a New Career in Gear.'

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Entries

» Getting a New Career in Gear

» Wake’s Jewel

» Rives Living His Dream

» Levon Is Across the Great Divide

» New Chapter for Petersen

» Spring In All Its Glory

» Trackbar Adjustment and a High Groove

» Interview with Jeff Bzdelik: Part I

» Interview with Jeff Bzdelik: Part II

» Interview with Jeff Bzdelik: Part III

Categories
Syndication

» RSS 1.0
» RSS 2.0
» Atom