Restoring Order Out of Mayhem

A while back I happened to catch some old grainy film of the most unforgettable college basketball game I ever saw, N.C. State’s 103-100 victory over Maryland in the 1974 ACC championship. What made the game so gripping was that only one of these teams for the ages was going to get to play in the NCAA Tournament because of the insane rule that only one team from any conference was eligible. Talk about motivation. The Wolfpack won the game, of course, and went on to beat UCLA and Marquette in Greensboro for the ACC’s second national title. Maryland turned down the NIT, feeling it was beneath them—which it clearly was.

But what really jumped out at me were a) the short shorts, of course, b) the players, by today’s muscle beach standards, were downright skinny, and c) the defender actually stood behind the offensive player in the lane, with space between them. There was no bodying up and shoving and slamming like you see today.

How far we’ve come, but in which direction it’s hard to tell.

The subject of officials and how the college game is called has been a hot topic lately, and it got ever hotter after Sunday’s donnybrook between Wake and Duke in Cameron Indoor Stadium. I usually don’t pay too much attention to fans complaining about officiating because after any game played anywhere you can troll the message boards of the losing team or listen to call-in shows or just hang out at the right (or wrong) establishments and invariably find the real reason for the defeat. The refs screwed them again. As humans we always get screwed when we lose. We’re hard-wired that way. And as I’ll say once again, the next best thing to winning is to lose with a good excuse.

But what is equally obvious is that the game has evolved—perhaps mutated—into a new sport that bears next to no resemblance to what came before. It’s a war underneath the basket, and it takes a fully grown man to hold his own. And the game has become impossible to call.

So that begs the question of what can anyone do. Most of the ACC coaches were asked that last week and I really didn’t hear anybody but Roy Williams of North Carolina come up with an answer. Williams’ solution was that the referees simply call the foul, which I found to be rather simplistic. If every foul is called, every game lasts 3 1/2 hours and every player on both teams fouls out. Who wants to watch that?

The only ray of hope is that the NCAA at least recognizes the problem and John W. Adams, the coordinator of men’s basketball officiating, is on it. You may have seen the article that Alexander Wolff wrote for Sports Illustrated in December about Adams’ efforts to clean up the game Referee Czar One of Adams’ solutions has been to established what he calls absolutes, actions that are going to prompt an automatic whistle, no exceptions made.

It won’t be easy. Referees get used to calling a game a certain way, and as we all saw with the strike zone in baseball, it’s hard to modify behavior so firmly entrenched. But headway has been made in baseball. Through technology the custodians of the game have defined the strike zone and have insisted that the umpires adhere to it. And if they don’t, they suffer the consequences. The strike zone, while still not perfect, is a far sight better than it was during Eric Gregg’s heyday of the 80s and 90s.

Basketball will be tougher, but we can all hope that some semblance of order is restored from the mayhem. Mayhem can be fun from time to time, but it gets old.

Back to the main page.

By Dan Collins on 01/20/2010 (1:28 pm)

Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Comments

^ Ditto the above.  I played when it was a non-contact sport.  Players adjust to how the game is called, as do coaches.  No one wants their best players on the bench in foul trouble, or even worse hurt which is want is going to happen with all the physical play that has evolved.  Basketball has lost its beauty to too much physicality.  Bring back the beauty of the game by calling the fouls; the players will adjust, so will the coaches and the game won’t last more than 2 hours as it does now.

rmg on 01/22/2010 (7:24 pm)

Great post, Dan.  I’d asked if anything like this was being pursued in my angry rant after the Duke game and this was right on point.  I would love to see a system where some accountability was assigned and consistently bad performers were moved out to make room for new hopefuls.

I watch a lot more baseball now than 10 years ago.  The more uniform strike zone is a big reason for that.

I would watch a lot more regular season non-ACC games if there was more consistency among the NCAA refs.

John on 01/21/2010 (6:15 pm)

I agree that the game has gotten warped.  If a player holding the ball is pushed or bumped so that they are forced out of bounds, then it should be a foul.  Instead, todays refs will call the guy out of bounds, and give the ball to the defending (offending) player.

When I grew up, basketball was considered a “non-contact” sport.  I thought the style of play with David Thompson and Walter Davis was a lot prettier to watch.  It was much more about skill and agility, rather than size and strength.  Next thing we know,  they’ll be wearing pads and helmets.

Trouble on 01/21/2010 (5:33 pm)

the ONLY thing I would ask right now is to get the restricted circle painted in the lane. Watching Duke draw charges right under the basket is all that people need to see. First and foremost, it’s dangerous. Every commentator and person I’ve talked to screams for this. It completely takes out the arbitrariness of the “restricted circle” rule that the refs are supposed to use this year

Aaron on 01/21/2010 (5:20 pm)

Have to agree with Roy on this one.  Really not that novel of an idea, “play by the rules”.  The idea that the game would last 31/2 hours and everyone would foul out is predicated on the thought that the coaches would continue to coach the same way and that the players would not adjust to how the game is called.  When David Thompson played games did not last 31/2 hours and the games were tremendous from a fan’s standpoint.  Today, kids are taught to body up on the player they are guarding and hand check in the lane and on the perimeter.  They are taught to break the rules knowing the officials will not call it unless it is flagrant.

Some years ago, John Wooden was interviewed at a Lakers game and was asked about the difference between the Pro game and College.  He said “someday one of those guys is going to cradle the ball in his right arm and take off running, lowering his shoulder into the defensive guy and then dunk it.  And sadly it is coming.”

jcg on 01/20/2010 (2:07 pm)

Page 1 of 1 pages
Dan Collins covers Wake Forest University sports for the Winston-Salem Journal.

Recent Comments

» Alan on 'Wahoos 68, Imposters 44.'

» Alan on 'Wahoos 68, Imposters 44.'

» beach deac on 'R-E-S-P-E-C-T-?.'

» Dan Collins on 'Back in Black and Gold.'

» DTuttle on 'Back in Black and Gold.'

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Recent Entries

» Wahoos 68, Imposters 44

» Back in Black and Gold

» Making Sense of the Nonsensical

» R-E-S-P-E-C-T-?

» Salvaging Something From Class of 2012

» Big Ones Getting Bigger at Wake

» A Panoramic View of Baby Blue

» A Downer of a Night

» Stale Words About Freshmen

» Young is Young No Longer

Categories
Syndication

» RSS 1.0
» RSS 2.0
» Atom